Think About This

Should we trust robots to keep our planes safe?

Take a moment to consider your stance on this issue before reading on.

Introduction

NASA is funding new tech that could change how we check airplanes. They’re backing drones to inspect planes before flights.

This could make flying safer and save time and money. But it also raises questions about the role of technology in our lives. Let’s explore what this means for air travel and our society.

How Drone Checks Work

Near Earth Autonomy, the company behind this idea, says their drones can do in 30 minutes what usually takes 4 hours. Here’s how:

  1. A drone flies around the plane on a set path.
  2. It takes detailed pictures of the plane.
  3. Experts can look at these pictures from anywhere.
  4. They compare new pictures with old ones to spot problems.

To see this technology in action, watch this video from Mainblades, a company working on similar drone inspection systems:

“This could save airlines $10,000 for every hour a plane isn’t flying.” – Near Earth Autonomy spokesperson

But is saving money worth the potential risks? Let’s look at both sides.

Good Things About Drone Checks

BenefitWhat It Means
Saves TimeChecks are much faster
Saves MoneyFewer delays mean less lost money
Safer for WorkersNo need to climb on planes
Might Catch More IssuesDrones take very clear pictures
Expert Help from AfarSpecialists can check from anywhere

A Boeing 777-300ER aircraft is being inspected by one of Near Earth Autonomy’s drones Feb. 2, 2024, at an Emirates Airlines facility in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Possible Challenges

While drone checks sound great, there are some things to think about:

  1. Can drones really work as well as people?
  2. How do we keep the system safe from hackers?
  3. Will air safety officials approve this new method?
  4. What happens to workers who might lose their jobs?
  5. Are we relying too much on robots instead of people?

These are tough questions without easy answers. What do you think?

Learning from Past Mistakes: The PG&E Story

To see why good checks matter, let’s look at what happened when a power company cut corners.

When PG&E Didn’t Check Well Enough

What Happened: PG&E in California stopped checking their equipment closely.

Result: In 2018, their faulty equipment started a fire that:

  • Killed 84 people
  • Destroyed a whole town
  • Cost the company billions

What We Learned:

  1. Regular, close checks are very important.
  2. Quick looks from far away can miss big problems.
  3. Trying to save money on safety can lead to disasters.

“We can’t put money before safety. Too many lives are at risk.” – California State Fire Marshal

Watch this video to see what can happen when safety checks go wrong:


This video shows a giant fire that hurt many people. It’s not about planes, but it teaches us why checking things carefully is so important.

When we don’t check things well, people can get hurt. This is true for planes, power lines, and many other things that keep us safe.

The Future of Safety Checks

As we embrace drone technology, the future of safety checks is evolving rapidly. Here’s a glimpse of what’s coming:

  1. Now: Drones inspecting planes, reducing human error but raising privacy concerns.
  2. Soon: AI predicting failures before they happen, potentially saving lives but relying heavily on data collection.
  3. In 5 Years: Nanobots repairing planes mid-flight, revolutionizing maintenance but introducing new risks.
  4. In 10 Years: Quantum sensors detecting microscopic flaws, offering unprecedented safety but at enormous cost.
  5. Far Future: Fully autonomous aircraft with self-healing materials, eliminating traditional inspections but removing human oversight entirely.

Which of these excites you the most? Which worries you? Consider how each advancement might impact jobs, privacy, and our control over technology.

Finding the Right Mix

As we use more tech, we need to:

  • Use tech to help people, not replace them
  • Train workers to use both old and new ways
  • Often check if new systems work well
  • Make sure someone is in charge, even with robots

Wrapping Up: Using New Ideas Safely

NASA backing drone checks is a big step for flight safety. It could make flying safer and save money. But we need to be careful as we use this new tech.

The PG&E story shows what can go wrong when safety checks aren’t done right. As we start using drones, we must make sure they work with human experts, not instead of them.

The future of safety checks will mix new tech with human know-how. By learning from past mistakes and using new tools wisely, we can make flying safer for everyone.

What role do you think humans should play in this new world of high-tech safety checks?


Common Questions About Drone Checks

Q: Will drones replace human inspectors?
A: No, drones will help human experts, not replace them.

Q: When will we see drones checking planes everywhere?
A: Experts think it might happen in 3-5 years, if safety officials approve.

Q: Will drones at airports cause privacy issues?
A: There will be strict rules to make sure drones only look at planes, not people.

What do you think about drone plane checks?

Aircraft mechanic inspects and checks the technology of a jet in a hangar at the airport
Aircraft mechanic inspects and checks the technology of a jet in a hangar at the airport

Watch the Full American Greed Episode: Burned By Greed Concerning PG&E

  • Video of a bony lion in a Chinese enclosure surfaces

    Video of a bony lion in a Chinese enclosure surfaces

    Stresses the essence of PETA’s recent court win against a Californian Zoo PETA is celebrating a recent March 2023 court victory that ruled that the Monterey Zoo had failed to demonstrate that the use of canes to control their elephants was an activity that the First Amendment protected. [i] The district court found that the […]


  • How can the State Bar enforce its new civility rules for lawyers when clients want ruthless sharks in the courtroom?

    How can the State Bar enforce its new civility rules for lawyers when clients want ruthless sharks in the courtroom?

    Objectifying or demeaning a member of the profession, especially when based on gender, race, sexual preference, gender identity, or other such characteristics, is uncivil and unacceptable. (Briganti v. Chow (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 504.) The State Bar of California’s Board of Trustees has taken a bold step toward improving the behavior of attorneys in the state. They have…


  • Ukrainians Relish Recent Swift Win

    Ukrainians Relish Recent Swift Win

    The UA Flag is Now Raised in Kherson Following an Abrupt Retaking of Vysokopillya According to recent reports, Ukraine has retaken “Blahodativka, Vysokopillya, and Lyubymivka.”   The battle over the Kherson region has evolved into Ukraine’s recent counteroffensive measures to push Russian-controlled areas back further and further. During the weekend, Ukraine was able to “cross […]


  • Local lobster fisherman’s livelihood now lost in one fell swoop-Update on his new license suspension

    Local lobster fisherman’s livelihood now lost in one fell swoop-Update on his new license suspension

    Arthur Esparza, a San Diego County lobster fisherman, might never fish again. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) wants to take away his fishing license for good. It’s a big deal that’s got everyone talking about how we use our oceans. What Did Esparza Do Wrong? The CDFW says Esparza broke several fishing…


  • In 84% of all incidents reported, white men were responsible for the threat or harassment, says alarming SD County study

    In 84% of all incidents reported, white men were responsible for the threat or harassment, says alarming SD County study

    Results from a recent study into threatening and harassing behavior toward San Diego County elected representatives reveal that 82% of female elected officials and 66% of male elected officials reported receiving threats and harassment. Furthermore, 61% of women and 32% of men who responded admitted to having considered leaving public service due to the threats…